Who benefits from banning open source developers?

Who are the type of people who benefit from banning and suppressing open source software developers?

The only people who benefit from banning open source developers are the people who see open source developers as a competition who needs to be disabled.

What governments, what narcissists, what business, who benefits from banning open source competition?

Stephen DeKenninck is one of these people who likes to benefit from suppressing open source developers.

MIT academics and Julia language people are the people who like to benefit from suppressing open source develooers.

Closed source companies like to benefit from suppressing their free software competitors.

Governments and narcissists like to think it’s their job to suppress people and technologies if it benefits them.

When you collectively gang up on an open source developer to ban and suppress them, who do you think benefits from that?

Julia community, academia, Stephen DeKenninck, etc all these people and institutions have proven repeatedly that they want to benefit from suppressing open source development.

People like Stephen DeKenninck are petty fools who are easily manipulated by governments, corporations, and their own narcissism. Manipulated into what? You know what, manipulated into suppressing the free and open development of science and sodtware.

What a bunch of morons and idiots who are willing to suppress free and open development of science and software.

Academies and universities arent there to advance society or advance science. They only exist to inflate egos and to push aside people they dont like.

Academia and universities are 99% politics about who gets to screw who over, and deliberations on how to suppress this person or that person, or how to stop that idea i dont like.

I release free software because I actually build stuff, while the universities are busy suppressing people because their only role is politics to screw people over.